Business week op-ed
I have an op-ed running in Business Week today in which I lambaste HP and specifically their chairperson, Patricia Dunn for unethical behavior. I notice the comments are piling up, some of which seem to be taking the position that it's unethical to leak information to the press the way Keyworth did and therefore Dunn's actions were justified.
This is an old argument in which the rightness of the means of a given action is subordinated to accomplishing a justifiable end. This is the same stupid reasoning that got us into Iraq and Vietnam before it. I do think that there are cases in which spying on a reporter or a Director is justified; I just don't think this was one.
There's an old military principle which says that sometime you have to do something that's illegal, unethical or just wrong. You do it for reasons which to you are sufficient. The principle is that in this case, you do what you must, but take responsiblity later and if necessary, punishment. People who perform the dubious action, deny responsiblity later when caught and blame subordinates are acting cowardly and I address that accusation at a broader audience than Hewlett-Packard.
Posted on October 11, 2006





